宇航橡胶技术中心

宇航橡胶技术中心

Material Technical Guides

Rubber Hardness: Shore A (ASTM D2240) vs IRHD (ISO 48-2) — Principles, Correlation, and the E(MPa) Formula

Technical comparison of Shore A (ASTM D2240) vs IRHD (ISO 48-2) rubber hardness measurement methods: principles, correlation, and Young's modulus estimation E(MPa) = (15.75 x ShA)/(100 - ShA).

16 min read
rubber hardnessShore AIRHDASTM D2240ISO 48-2Young's modulusdurometer

Article Info

Category
Material Technical Guides
Tags
rubber hardnessShore AIRHDASTM D2240ISO 48-2Young's modulusdurometer
Keywords
rubber hardness Shore A IRHD comparison / ASTM D2240 durometer / ISO 48-2 / Young's modulus from Shore A / Nanjing Yuhang Rubber

Expertise Signal

Technical review
YuHang Rubber Technical Team
Review Role
Industrial Rubber Product Technical Review
Known For
Rubber FenderRubber TrackRubber SheetRubber HoseRubber ExtrusionCustom Rubber Parts

Industrial rubber product manufacturer covering rubber fenders, rubber tracks, rubber sheets, rubber hoses, extrusions, belts and custom molded rubber parts.

Rubber Hardness: Shore A (ASTM D2240) vs IRHD (ISO 48-2) — Principles, Correlation, and the E(MPa) Formula cover image

1. Why Hardness Measurement Matters

Hardness is the most commonly specified and measured physical property of rubber. It serves as a rapid quality-control check, a compound consistency indicator, and a proxy for elastic modulus. However, rubber hardness is fundamentally different from metal hardness (Rockwell, Brinell, Vickers) — it measures elastic indentation resistance, not plastic deformation resistance.

The two dominant international methods are:

  • Shore A (ASTM D2240, ISO 868) — widely used in North America and Asia
  • IRHD — International Rubber Hardness Degrees (ISO 48-2) — widely used in Europe

Although they report on the same nominal scale (0 = infinitely soft, 100 = infinitely hard), the measurement principles differ, and the numbers are not always interchangeable.

2. Shore A Durometer (ASTM D2240)

2.1 Measurement Principle

A Shore A durometer consists of a truncated cone indenter (0.79 mm diameter tip, 35° included angle) pressed into the rubber by a calibrated spring. The penetration depth (0 to 2.54 mm) is inversely proportional to hardness:

  • 0 Shore A = full 2.54 mm penetration (no resistance)
  • 100 Shore A = zero penetration (infinite resistance; a glass or metal plate)

The spring force varies with indentation:

  • At 0 Shore A (full penetration): spring force = 0.55 N
  • At 100 Shore A (zero penetration): spring force = 8.06 N

Test conditions per ASTM D2240:

  • Specimen thickness: minimum 6.0 mm (can stack thinner sheets)
  • Reading time: instantaneous (1 s) or after 15 s (delayed, reported as "Shore A/15")
  • Temperature: 23 ±2°C, 50 ±5% RH
  • Multiple readings: 5 measurements at different points ≥12 mm apart, ≥6 mm from edge

2.2 Shore A: Instantaneous vs. Delayed Reading

Rubber exhibits viscoelastic creep — it continues to deform under sustained load. The difference between instantaneous (1 s) and delayed (15 s) readings indicates the compound's creep tendency.

Hardness (Shore A, Instant)Hardness (Shore A/15, Delayed)DifferenceMaterial Indication
70673 pointsLow-creep compound (filled NR, CR, EPDM)
70637 pointsModerate-creep compound (SBR, NBR)
705812 pointsHigh-creep compound (unfilled silicone, low-hardness butyl)

Rule of thumb: A difference >5 points between instantaneous and 15-second readings suggests potential creep issues in service. Always specify whether hardness is "instant" or "delayed 15 s" in specifications.

3. IRHD (ISO 48-2)

3.1 Measurement Principle

IRHD uses a spherical indenter (2.50 mm diameter ball) pressed into the rubber with a specified contact force and then a major force.

StepForcePurpose
1. Contact force30 ±1 mNEstablish zero-reference (initial contact)
2. Major force5.40 ±0.01 NIndentation force (held 30 s before reading)
3. Return to contact30 ±1 mNRecovery reading (held 30 s)

The differential penetration (D) between major force and contact force is converted to IRHD via:

IRHD = 100 – (D / 0.1) × 100 (where D is in mm)

Thus IRHD is proportional to penetration, analogous to Shore A. However, because IRHD uses a sphere (not a cone), the stress field under the indenter is different, leading to different sensitivity in different hardness ranges.

3.2 IRHD Methods

MethodIndenter Diameter (mm)Major Force (N)Sample Thickness (mm, min)Best for
IRHD N (normal)2.505.408.0Standard rubber, 30–95 IRHD
IRHD H (high hardness)1.005.406.0High-hardness rubber, 85–100 IRHD
IRHD L (low hardness)5.005.4012.0Soft rubber, 10–35 IRHD
IRHD M (micro)0.400.1532.0Small specimens, O-rings, thin sections

4. Shore A vs. IRHD: Correlation and Differences

PropertyShore A (ASTM D2240)IRHD (ISO 48-2)
Indenter shapeTruncated cone (35° angle)Sphere (2.5 mm ball)
LoadingCalibrated spring (non-linear force profile)Dead-weight (constant force)
Reading time1 s (instant) or 15 s (delayed)30 s after major force applied
Test time~3 s (instant)~60 s (30 s + 30 s)
Specimen thickness≥6 mm≥8 mm
PortabilityExcellent (handheld durometer)Laboratory (bench instrument)
Operator sensitivityModerate (requires steady hand)Low (dead-weight loading eliminates operator variation)
Scale range0–1000–100

Correlation relationship: In the 30–80 range, Shore A and IRHD values are typically within ±2 points. Outside this range, systematic deviations appear:

RegionCorrelation BehaviorReason
30–80Shore A ≈ IRHD (±2 points)Both methods in their optimal measurement range
Below 30IRHD reads 3–8 points higher than Shore ACone indenter penetrates more deeply in very soft rubber
Above 80IRHD reads 2–5 points lower than Shore ADifferences in high-hardness resolution between cone and sphere indenters

Important: There is no universal, ISO/ASTM-sanctioned mathematical conversion formula between Shore A and IRHD. The correlation is empirical and material-dependent. Always specify the method when specifying hardness.

5. Estimating Young's Modulus from Shore A Hardness

For incompressible materials (rubber's Poisson's ratio ν ≈ 0.499 to 0.500), an empirical relationship between Shore A hardness and Young's modulus E exists. The most widely cited formula, developed by Gent (1958) and refined through decades of empirical data:

E (MPa) ≈ (15.75 × Shore A) / (100 – Shore A)

This formula is valid for Shore A 20–90. Derived from the indentation mechanics of a rigid cone penetrating an elastic half-space, combining the Shore durometer spring-force profile with the Sneddon indentation solution.

Shore AE, Estimated (MPa)E, Typical Measured Range (MPa)Comment
306.71.5–3.0Formula overestimates for very soft, lightly-filled compounds
4010.53.0–5.5Reasonable for carbon-black-filled compounds
5015.85.0–9.0Good agreement for most filled rubbers
6023.69.0–16.0Reliable region of the formula
7036.817.0–28.0Reliable region
8063.030.0–55.0Formula begins to diverge; measured E spans a wider range
90141.870.0–120.0Formula overestimates; near the asymptote at 100

Alternative quick estimates (valid for 30–70 Shore A):

  • E (MPa) ≈ 0.75 × Shore A – 20 (coarse approximation, less accurate)
  • G (MPa) ≈ E/3 (for incompressible rubber, ν ≈ 0.5)
  • Bulk modulus K ≈ 1000–2000 MPa (all rubber formulations)

Critical caveat: Shore-A-to-modulus conversion is orientation-dependent. The formula estimates Young's modulus at the indentation strain, which is typically 5–15% compression. At higher strains, rubber stiffens (strain hardening), and at lower strains, it is softer (Mullins effect in filled rubbers). Use the formula for initial sizing and always validate with a tensile test per ASTM D412 for critical applications.

6. Hardness Tolerances in Practice

Typical commercial tolerances for rubber hardness (per ISO 3302 / RMA handbook):

Specified HardnessShore A Tolerance (Commercial)Shore A Tolerance (Precision)
30–50 Shore A±5±3
55–70 Shore A±5±3
75–90 Shore A±5±3
>90 Shore A±6±4

A tighter tolerance (±3) requires controlled compounding, consistent mixing, and statistical process control — it typically adds 15–25% to the part cost.

7. Temperature and Hardness

Rubber hardness is temperature-dependent. As temperature decreases, hardness increases due to reduced molecular mobility. The relationship is approximately:

ΔShore A ≈ -0.15 × ΔT (°C) near room temperature (valid for 0–50°C for typical compounds).

Temperature (°C)Expected Change from 23°C ReadingPractical Impact
-20+6 to +10 Shore A (harder)NBR seals may leak (insufficient compliance)
0+3 to +5 Shore AStartup stiffness in cold environments
230 (reference)Standard test temperature
50-4 to -5 Shore A (softer)Sealing force reduction
80-8 to -12 Shore ASignificant softening; verify seal function

For precision applications operating at extreme temperatures, specify end-use temperature hardness testing rather than relying on room-temperature conversion.


<footer class="yuhang-entity-links">

Nanjing Yuhang Rubber Co., Ltd. measures hardness on every production batch using calibrated Shore A durometers (ASTM D2240) and IRHD bench instruments (ISO 48-2). Our in-house quality laboratory verifies hardness ±3 Shore A for precision applications and provides full E-modulus correlation data when required. Serving rubber components to customers in over 75 countries.

</footer>

FAQ

Can this article be used as the final selection basis?

It is intended for preliminary technical review. Final material or product selection should be confirmed with the actual medium, temperature, load, dimensions, drawings and sample testing when needed.

What information should be provided for an inquiry?

Please provide the application equipment, working medium, temperature range, dimensions, quantity, drawing or sample information so the technical discussion can be organized faster.

Inquiry

Request Product and Material Support

Share your product type, material requirements, dimensions, quantity and working conditions. The platform can help organize the next technical discussion.

Submit Inquiry