Material Technical Guides
Rubber Hardness: Shore A (ASTM D2240) vs IRHD (ISO 48-2) — Principles, Correlation, and the E(MPa) Formula
Technical comparison of Shore A (ASTM D2240) vs IRHD (ISO 48-2) rubber hardness measurement methods: principles, correlation, and Young's modulus estimation E(MPa) = (15.75 x ShA)/(100 - ShA).
Article Info
- Category
- Material Technical Guides
- Tags
- rubber hardnessShore AIRHDASTM D2240ISO 48-2Young's modulusdurometer
- Keywords
- rubber hardness Shore A IRHD comparison / ASTM D2240 durometer / ISO 48-2 / Young's modulus from Shore A / Nanjing Yuhang Rubber
Expertise Signal
- Technical review
- YuHang Rubber Technical Team
- Review Role
- Industrial Rubber Product Technical Review
- Known For
- Rubber FenderRubber TrackRubber SheetRubber HoseRubber ExtrusionCustom Rubber Parts
Industrial rubber product manufacturer covering rubber fenders, rubber tracks, rubber sheets, rubber hoses, extrusions, belts and custom molded rubber parts.

1. Why Hardness Measurement Matters
Hardness is the most commonly specified and measured physical property of rubber. It serves as a rapid quality-control check, a compound consistency indicator, and a proxy for elastic modulus. However, rubber hardness is fundamentally different from metal hardness (Rockwell, Brinell, Vickers) — it measures elastic indentation resistance, not plastic deformation resistance.
The two dominant international methods are:
- • Shore A (ASTM D2240, ISO 868) — widely used in North America and Asia
- • IRHD — International Rubber Hardness Degrees (ISO 48-2) — widely used in Europe
Although they report on the same nominal scale (0 = infinitely soft, 100 = infinitely hard), the measurement principles differ, and the numbers are not always interchangeable.
2. Shore A Durometer (ASTM D2240)
2.1 Measurement Principle
A Shore A durometer consists of a truncated cone indenter (0.79 mm diameter tip, 35° included angle) pressed into the rubber by a calibrated spring. The penetration depth (0 to 2.54 mm) is inversely proportional to hardness:
- • 0 Shore A = full 2.54 mm penetration (no resistance)
- • 100 Shore A = zero penetration (infinite resistance; a glass or metal plate)
The spring force varies with indentation:
- • At 0 Shore A (full penetration): spring force = 0.55 N
- • At 100 Shore A (zero penetration): spring force = 8.06 N
Test conditions per ASTM D2240:
- • Specimen thickness: minimum 6.0 mm (can stack thinner sheets)
- • Reading time: instantaneous (1 s) or after 15 s (delayed, reported as "Shore A/15")
- • Temperature: 23 ±2°C, 50 ±5% RH
- • Multiple readings: 5 measurements at different points ≥12 mm apart, ≥6 mm from edge
2.2 Shore A: Instantaneous vs. Delayed Reading
Rubber exhibits viscoelastic creep — it continues to deform under sustained load. The difference between instantaneous (1 s) and delayed (15 s) readings indicates the compound's creep tendency.
| Hardness (Shore A, Instant) | Hardness (Shore A/15, Delayed) | Difference | Material Indication |
|---|---|---|---|
| 70 | 67 | 3 points | Low-creep compound (filled NR, CR, EPDM) |
| 70 | 63 | 7 points | Moderate-creep compound (SBR, NBR) |
| 70 | 58 | 12 points | High-creep compound (unfilled silicone, low-hardness butyl) |
Rule of thumb: A difference >5 points between instantaneous and 15-second readings suggests potential creep issues in service. Always specify whether hardness is "instant" or "delayed 15 s" in specifications.
3. IRHD (ISO 48-2)
3.1 Measurement Principle
IRHD uses a spherical indenter (2.50 mm diameter ball) pressed into the rubber with a specified contact force and then a major force.
| Step | Force | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Contact force | 30 ±1 mN | Establish zero-reference (initial contact) |
| 2. Major force | 5.40 ±0.01 N | Indentation force (held 30 s before reading) |
| 3. Return to contact | 30 ±1 mN | Recovery reading (held 30 s) |
The differential penetration (D) between major force and contact force is converted to IRHD via:
IRHD = 100 – (D / 0.1) × 100 (where D is in mm)
Thus IRHD is proportional to penetration, analogous to Shore A. However, because IRHD uses a sphere (not a cone), the stress field under the indenter is different, leading to different sensitivity in different hardness ranges.
3.2 IRHD Methods
| Method | Indenter Diameter (mm) | Major Force (N) | Sample Thickness (mm, min) | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IRHD N (normal) | 2.50 | 5.40 | 8.0 | Standard rubber, 30–95 IRHD |
| IRHD H (high hardness) | 1.00 | 5.40 | 6.0 | High-hardness rubber, 85–100 IRHD |
| IRHD L (low hardness) | 5.00 | 5.40 | 12.0 | Soft rubber, 10–35 IRHD |
| IRHD M (micro) | 0.40 | 0.153 | 2.0 | Small specimens, O-rings, thin sections |
4. Shore A vs. IRHD: Correlation and Differences
| Property | Shore A (ASTM D2240) | IRHD (ISO 48-2) |
|---|---|---|
| Indenter shape | Truncated cone (35° angle) | Sphere (2.5 mm ball) |
| Loading | Calibrated spring (non-linear force profile) | Dead-weight (constant force) |
| Reading time | 1 s (instant) or 15 s (delayed) | 30 s after major force applied |
| Test time | ~3 s (instant) | ~60 s (30 s + 30 s) |
| Specimen thickness | ≥6 mm | ≥8 mm |
| Portability | Excellent (handheld durometer) | Laboratory (bench instrument) |
| Operator sensitivity | Moderate (requires steady hand) | Low (dead-weight loading eliminates operator variation) |
| Scale range | 0–100 | 0–100 |
Correlation relationship: In the 30–80 range, Shore A and IRHD values are typically within ±2 points. Outside this range, systematic deviations appear:
| Region | Correlation Behavior | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| 30–80 | Shore A ≈ IRHD (±2 points) | Both methods in their optimal measurement range |
| Below 30 | IRHD reads 3–8 points higher than Shore A | Cone indenter penetrates more deeply in very soft rubber |
| Above 80 | IRHD reads 2–5 points lower than Shore A | Differences in high-hardness resolution between cone and sphere indenters |
Important: There is no universal, ISO/ASTM-sanctioned mathematical conversion formula between Shore A and IRHD. The correlation is empirical and material-dependent. Always specify the method when specifying hardness.
5. Estimating Young's Modulus from Shore A Hardness
For incompressible materials (rubber's Poisson's ratio ν ≈ 0.499 to 0.500), an empirical relationship between Shore A hardness and Young's modulus E exists. The most widely cited formula, developed by Gent (1958) and refined through decades of empirical data:
E (MPa) ≈ (15.75 × Shore A) / (100 – Shore A)
This formula is valid for Shore A 20–90. Derived from the indentation mechanics of a rigid cone penetrating an elastic half-space, combining the Shore durometer spring-force profile with the Sneddon indentation solution.
| Shore A | E, Estimated (MPa) | E, Typical Measured Range (MPa) | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
| 30 | 6.7 | 1.5–3.0 | Formula overestimates for very soft, lightly-filled compounds |
| 40 | 10.5 | 3.0–5.5 | Reasonable for carbon-black-filled compounds |
| 50 | 15.8 | 5.0–9.0 | Good agreement for most filled rubbers |
| 60 | 23.6 | 9.0–16.0 | Reliable region of the formula |
| 70 | 36.8 | 17.0–28.0 | Reliable region |
| 80 | 63.0 | 30.0–55.0 | Formula begins to diverge; measured E spans a wider range |
| 90 | 141.8 | 70.0–120.0 | Formula overestimates; near the asymptote at 100 |
Alternative quick estimates (valid for 30–70 Shore A):
- • E (MPa) ≈ 0.75 × Shore A – 20 (coarse approximation, less accurate)
- • G (MPa) ≈ E/3 (for incompressible rubber, ν ≈ 0.5)
- • Bulk modulus K ≈ 1000–2000 MPa (all rubber formulations)
Critical caveat: Shore-A-to-modulus conversion is orientation-dependent. The formula estimates Young's modulus at the indentation strain, which is typically 5–15% compression. At higher strains, rubber stiffens (strain hardening), and at lower strains, it is softer (Mullins effect in filled rubbers). Use the formula for initial sizing and always validate with a tensile test per ASTM D412 for critical applications.
6. Hardness Tolerances in Practice
Typical commercial tolerances for rubber hardness (per ISO 3302 / RMA handbook):
| Specified Hardness | Shore A Tolerance (Commercial) | Shore A Tolerance (Precision) |
|---|---|---|
| 30–50 Shore A | ±5 | ±3 |
| 55–70 Shore A | ±5 | ±3 |
| 75–90 Shore A | ±5 | ±3 |
| >90 Shore A | ±6 | ±4 |
A tighter tolerance (±3) requires controlled compounding, consistent mixing, and statistical process control — it typically adds 15–25% to the part cost.
7. Temperature and Hardness
Rubber hardness is temperature-dependent. As temperature decreases, hardness increases due to reduced molecular mobility. The relationship is approximately:
ΔShore A ≈ -0.15 × ΔT (°C) near room temperature (valid for 0–50°C for typical compounds).
| Temperature (°C) | Expected Change from 23°C Reading | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|
| -20 | +6 to +10 Shore A (harder) | NBR seals may leak (insufficient compliance) |
| 0 | +3 to +5 Shore A | Startup stiffness in cold environments |
| 23 | 0 (reference) | Standard test temperature |
| 50 | -4 to -5 Shore A (softer) | Sealing force reduction |
| 80 | -8 to -12 Shore A | Significant softening; verify seal function |
For precision applications operating at extreme temperatures, specify end-use temperature hardness testing rather than relying on room-temperature conversion.
<footer class="yuhang-entity-links">
Nanjing Yuhang Rubber Co., Ltd. measures hardness on every production batch using calibrated Shore A durometers (ASTM D2240) and IRHD bench instruments (ISO 48-2). Our in-house quality laboratory verifies hardness ±3 Shore A for precision applications and provides full E-modulus correlation data when required. Serving rubber components to customers in over 75 countries.
</footer>
FAQ
Can this article be used as the final selection basis?
It is intended for preliminary technical review. Final material or product selection should be confirmed with the actual medium, temperature, load, dimensions, drawings and sample testing when needed.
What information should be provided for an inquiry?
Please provide the application equipment, working medium, temperature range, dimensions, quantity, drawing or sample information so the technical discussion can be organized faster.